The FTC has a telemarketing sales rule which requires do not call telemarketer compliance
The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers not telemarketing companies
National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News
DO NOT CALL STATE & FEDERAL REGULATORY NEWS

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000, http://copilevitz-canter.com/, braney@cckc-law.com. Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or donotcallcompliance.com and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
 
2021 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2020 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2019 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2016 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2013 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2011 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2010 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2009 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
2008 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2007 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2006 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2005 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2004 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State Do Not Call
 

February-March 2011 - Call Compliance News

In this issue:
  • A California Appeals Court has ruled that California’s Anti-Spam Law was not preempted by CAN-SPAM; the Court ruled that allowing state restrictions does not alter the "uniform standard" governing commercial e-mail content established under the CAN-SPAM Act.
  • A Colorado federal judge has issued a Preliminary Injunction stopping enforcement of a Colorado tax law which would require out-of-state companies to send an annual notice to customers of use tax requirements and require the company to send a list of customer information to the Department of Revenue for each such sale.
  • The Illinois Senate is considering a bill (SB 1572) which would modify Illinois’ "do-not-call" list law to include prerecorded political calls to persons on Illinois’ "do-not-call" registry.

FTC
The FTC has alleged that three companies violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule and its new debt relief provisions by making deceptive and unsubstantiated claims. The defendants reached a settlement with the FTC involving a payment of $500,000 and banning them from future debt relief business.

California
A California Appeals Court has ruled that California’s Anti-Spam Law was not preempted by CAN-SPAM because the Court ruled the state law only related to misleading statements in the emails.  Hypertouch v. ValueClick, Inc., et al.  The Court ruled that the prevention of “falsity and deception” included the restrictions found in California’s law and therefore it was not preempted.  The Court ruled that allowing state restrictions does not alter the “uniform standard” governing commercial e-mail content established under the CAN-SPAM Act.

Colorado
A federal court in Colorado has heard arguments on the DMA’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction against the Department of Revenue for the State of Colorado.  Colorado has passed a law requiring remote sellers to mail notices via first class mail to any Colorado consumer who purchased $500 or more of goods or services in 2010.  The seller must also provide the same information to the State of Colorado.  The judge indicated that he intended to render a decision prior to January 31, 2011.

A federal judge has issued a Preliminary Injunction stopping enforcement of a Colorado tax law which would require out-of-state companies to send an annual notice to customers of use tax requirements and require the company to send a list of customer information to the Department of Revenue for each such sale.  This is a major victory for interstate commerce and businesses making interstate calls.

Illinois
The Illinois Senate is considering a bill (SB 1572) which would modify Illinois’ “do-not-call” list law to include prerecorded political calls to persons on Illinois’ “do-not-call” registry.  As I have said before, such an inclusion likely would be unconstitutional given the protections for political calls and the fact that most people on the list signed onto it when political calls were not included in its restrictions.

Indiana
The Indiana House has passed a bill (HB 1273) and sent it to the Senate which would define “consumer” for purposes of Indiana’s “do-not-call” list to include any Indiana number including cell phones or other wireless devices.  The law would require that the place of primary use of the device be a residential street address in Indiana.  The bill specifically refers to VOIP service thus including VOIP members in residential locations in Indiana to the Indiana “do-not-call” list.

Kentucky
The Kentucky House is considering a bill (HB 395) which would reassign administration for telemarketing registration to the Consumer Protection office of the Attorney General.  This appears to be a change in name only and no change in the substance of the state regulation.

Maryland
The Maryland Senate is considering a bill (SB 527) which would prohibit political calls to persons on the national “do-not-call” registry only if they live in Anne Arundel County, Maryland.  This is one of the strangest pieces of legislation I have ever seen.

Missouri
A Missouri court has ruled that opt-out notices are required only in unsolicited fax advertisements.  Nack v. Walburg.

New York
The New York General Assembly is considering a bill (AB 4754) which would include facsimile transmissions within those telephone communications restricted by New York’s “do-not-call” law (which applies the national “do-not-call” registry).  Federal law already prohibits unsolicited facsimiles so this bill would have little effect.

The New York Senate is considering a bill which would amend New York’s telemarketing law to reassign enforcement of the New York “do-not-call” law to the Department of State rather than the Board of Consumer Protection which is within the New York governor’s office.

Ohio
A U.S. District Court in Ohio has ruled that private plaintiffs do not have private causes of action to allege script violations in prerecorded calls.  Burdge v. Association Health Care Management. The court ruled that failure to identify the name of the telemarketer and provide address and phone number is a technical or procedural violation not subject to a private cause of action.

Oklahoma
The Oklahoma Senate is considering a bill (SB 398) which would include text messages within those telephone communications restricted by the State’s telemarketing laws.

Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania is considering a bill which would amend the State’s “do-not-call” law to include business numbers in its state “do-not-call” regulations.  Given that the restrictions of “do-not-call” lists were held to be constitutional because they protected residential privacy rights and that businesses do not have privacy rights, in most cases, this provision is most likely unconstitutional.

Wisconsin
The Wisconsin Senate is considering a bill (SB 16) which would include electronic prerecorded messages within the definition of unsolicited telephone calls restricted by the Wisconsin “do-not-call” list.  Additionally, senders of electronic prerecorded messages would be required to register with the Department of Agriculture in Wisconsin and pay a fee.


The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.
 
  Telemarketing Do Not Call Compliance - Avoid large fines by staying compliant.   NDNCR and SDNCR - National Do Not Call Registry and State Do Not Call Registry - Know the difference.
The Do Not Call Compliance Silver Plan offers an Automated federal and state do not call compliance solution. Scrub your list yourself using our automated list scrubbing system.
Telemarketing companies are required to enroll in the Federal Do Not Call Registry.
Do Not Call Compliance.com has the robust software technology and computer power to properly remove (scrub) the Do Not Call numbers from your telemarketing lists.
The National Do Not Call Registry is a list of phone numbers from consumers who have indicated their preference to limit the telemarketing calls they receive.
This Site is designed for use with MSIE 7+,FF 3.5+, Chrome, Opera and other modern browsers.
A Broadband Internet Connection is recommended for uploading and downloading files.


Terms of Use | User Agreement | Privacy and Security Policy

© Copyright 2003-2021 Do Not Call Compliance - Telemarketing Do Not Call List Compliance Service.
All Rights Reserved. Information on this site is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Do Not Call Compliance | | 800-930-7252