The FTC has a telemarketing sales rule which requires do not call telemarketer compliance
The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers not telemarketing companies
National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000,, Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
2022 Newsletters
2021 Newsletters
2020 Newsletters
2019 Newsletters
2018 Newsletters
2017 Newsletters
2016 Newsletters
2015 Newsletters
2014 Newsletters
2013 Newsletters
2012 Newsletters
2011 Newsletters
2010 Newsletters
2009 Newsletters
2008 Newsletters
2007 Newsletters
2006 Newsletters
2005 Newsletters
2004 Newsletters
State Do Not Call

May 2021 - Call Compliance News


Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

The Fifth Circuit has ruled against a nutrition company in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) class action suit. Cranor v. 5 Star Nutrition. Cranor alleged a single text message sent to his cell phone constituted common law public nuisance. The Fifth Circuit agreed and reversed the prior dismissal based on the idea that the plaintiff had established injury.

Comment: The TCPA is only actionable as a private action if there has been more than one call or text sent to a plaintiff. In this case, the judge focused on types of harms protected at common law, not the precise point at which those harms become actionable.

Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) will be considering an order at its June 21, 2021 meeting which would “create an online portal located on the FCC website where private entities can submit information about suspected robocall and spoofing violations directly to the Enforcement Bureau.” This effort is part of further implementing the TRACED Act.

United States Senate

A bill has been introduced in the United States Senate which would allow for prison time and increased fines for violations of the TCPA. Deter Obnoxious, Nefarious, and Outrageous Telephone (“DO NOT”) Call Act. A similar bill was introduced in the House (HB 3810) in 2019 but did not pass.


The Florida legislature has passed a restrictive telemarketing law (SB 1120) and sent it to the governor for signature. It would amend Florida’s telephone solicitation law to prohibit “an automated system for the selection or dialing of telephone numbers or the playing of a recorded message when a connection is completed to number called without the prior express written consent of the called party.” See /2021/1120/BillText/er/HTML.

A “telephonic sales call” is defined as:

a telephone call, text message, or voicemail transmission to a consumer for the purpose of soliciting a sale of any consumer goods or services, soliciting an extension of credit for consumer goods or services, or obtaining information that will or may be used for the direct solicitation of a sale of consumer goods or services or an extension of credit for such purposes.

Fla. Stat. Ann. § 501.059(1)(g).

The term “automated system” is not defined, but it is not the same as an “automatic telephone dialing system” (“ATDS”) as defined by the TCPA and interpreted by the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid.

Comment: Because the statute also provides for a private cause of action, the section poses a significant risk for anyone calling Florida area codes. We will track this law and when it might become effective.


A Pennsylvania court has dismissed a TCPA case wherein plaintiff alleged that the dialing system “calls phone numbers from a stored list using a random or sequential number generator to select those phone numbers.” Camunas v. Nat’l Republican Senatorial Comm. The court did not entertain the idea whether or not this made the dialing system an ATDS or not, but rather dismissed the case on lack of information in the complaint.

Comment: This could be a loophole for plaintiffs in TCPA cases alleging that the dialing system used a random or sequential number generator to randomly select numbers off of a stored list to call. We will keep a close watch on this argument.

The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.
  Telemarketing Do Not Call Compliance - Avoid large fines by staying compliant.   NDNCR and SDNCR - National Do Not Call Registry and State Do Not Call Registry - Know the difference.
The Do Not Call Compliance Silver Plan offers an Automated federal and state do not call compliance solution. Scrub your list yourself using our automated list scrubbing system.
Telemarketing companies are required to enroll in the Federal Do Not Call Registry.
Do Not Call has the robust software technology and computer power to properly remove (scrub) the Do Not Call numbers from your telemarketing lists.
The National Do Not Call Registry is a list of phone numbers from consumers who have indicated their preference to limit the telemarketing calls they receive.
This Site is designed for use with MSIE 7+,FF 3.5+, Chrome, Opera and other modern browsers.
A Broadband Internet Connection is recommended for uploading and downloading files.

Terms of Use | User Agreement | Privacy and Security Policy

© Copyright 2003-2024 Do Not Call Compliance - Telemarketing Do Not Call List Compliance Service.
All Rights Reserved. Information on this site is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Do Not Call Compliance | | 800-930-7252