The FTC has a telemarketing sales rule which requires do not call telemarketer compliance
The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers not telemarketing companies
National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News
DO NOT CALL STATE & FEDERAL REGULATORY NEWS

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000, http://copilevitz-canter.com/, braney@cckc-law.com. Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or donotcallcompliance.com and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
 
2021 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2020 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2019 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2016 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2013 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2011 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2010 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2009 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
2008 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2007 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2006 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2005 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2004 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State Do Not Call
 

January 2021 - Call Compliance News

 

Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has requested public comment regarding how it should regulate unlawful robocalls to hospitals. Comments are due by February 1, 2021. See https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-asks-how-incent-use-hospital-anti-robocall-best-practices.

Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has published new civil penalty amounts for violations of its laws including actions for unfair deceptive trade practices often used in telemarketing cases. The maximum penalty per violation for an unfair deceptive act is now $43,280. See https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/01/14/2020-00314/adjustments-to-civil-penalty-amounts.

Comment: If the FTC considers each call to be a violation, these civil penalties could be ruinous. Thus it is very important to review compliance with the Telemarketing Sales Rule even though it is unlikely to be used in a civil class action like the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) so commonly is.

Florida

A Florida court has enforced an arbitration agreement against a plaintiff who defaulted on an auto loan, then alleged calls to collect the auto loan violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and the TCPA. Grand v. Rapid Auto Loans, Inc.

Comment: It is very important that your agreements with consumers contain enforceable arbitration clauses to prevent nuisance and worse, TCPA allegations. Please contact me if you would like us to review your contracts with regard to this issue.

Maine

A court has denied a pro se TCPA plaintiff’s claim to be able to file his suit under the TCPA and FDCPA without the filing fee. Strange v. Juiceman.

Maryland

Another frequent TCPA plaintiff Michael Worsham has lost a claim against Discount Power, Inc. Worsham v. Discount Power, Inc. The defendant argued his 17-count complaint based on seven calls failed to state a claim in violation of the TCPA or the Maryland Telephone Consumer Protection Act because he asserted “absolutely no facts to support [the] allegation that [defendant] used an [automatic telephone dialing system].”

Comment: Worsham is a disbarred attorney who now files pro se cases on his own behalf.

Nevada

A Las Vegas marijuana dispensary is now a defendant in a TCPA class action after it texted consumers who had provided their telephone number to the business when they visited to purchase marijuana. Stanley, et al. v. Terratech.

Comment: If, as alleged, the plaintiffs provided their number as a condition to enter the store, it is not prior express consent as the number was provided not to facilitate communication but for another limited purpose. If you intend to rely on this form of prior express consent, you should ensure that you do not create limitation that would allow a plaintiff to claim a provision to the telephone number is not prior express consent.

New Hampshire

The New Hampshire House is considering a bill (HB 510) which would modify the state’s automatic telephone dialing device statute to allow prerecorded calls only for emergency purposes or with prior express consent.

New York

A bill has been proposed in the New York Senate (SB 1349) which would require businesses make available to consumers free of charge access to all customers’ personal information retained by the business if the business provides that personal information to any third party. The restriction is not limited to businesses that sell consumer information, i.e. any form of sharing would trigger the notice requirement.

Texas

A judge has allowed a fraud counter-claim to proceed against Craig Cunningham, a frequent TCPA pro se plaintiff. Cunningham v. United States Auto Protection. The defendant alleged plaintiff made “material and continuous false representations … that he knew were false and that he intended [defendant] to rely upon.”

Comment: Plaintiffs often will “play along” with calls providing false information to generate later calls. This case could be an important defense against such cases.

The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.
 
  Telemarketing Do Not Call Compliance - Avoid large fines by staying compliant.   NDNCR and SDNCR - National Do Not Call Registry and State Do Not Call Registry - Know the difference.
The Do Not Call Compliance Silver Plan offers an Automated federal and state do not call compliance solution. Scrub your list yourself using our automated list scrubbing system.
Telemarketing companies are required to enroll in the Federal Do Not Call Registry.
Do Not Call Compliance.com has the robust software technology and computer power to properly remove (scrub) the Do Not Call numbers from your telemarketing lists.
The National Do Not Call Registry is a list of phone numbers from consumers who have indicated their preference to limit the telemarketing calls they receive.
This Site is designed for use with MSIE 7+,FF 3.5+, Chrome, Opera and other modern browsers.
A Broadband Internet Connection is recommended for uploading and downloading files.


Terms of Use | User Agreement | Privacy and Security Policy

© Copyright 2003-2021 Do Not Call Compliance - Telemarketing Do Not Call List Compliance Service.
All Rights Reserved. Information on this site is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Do Not Call Compliance | | 800-930-7252