The FTC has a telemarketing sales rule which requires do not call telemarketer compliance
The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers not telemarketing companies
National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News
DO NOT CALL STATE & FEDERAL REGULATORY NEWS

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000, http://copilevitz-canter.com/, braney@cckc-law.com. Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or donotcallcompliance.com and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
 
2021 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
2020 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2019 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2016 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2013 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2011 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2010 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2009 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
2008 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2007 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2006 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2005 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2004 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State Do Not Call
 

August 2020 - Call Compliance News

Telephone Consumer Protection Act

The Supreme Court review of the FCC definition of “automatic telephone dialing system” (“ATDS”) will be heard at the end of 2020, with a decision expected in early 2021. Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid.

Plaintiffs continue to file class actions at a furious rate, perhaps anticipating an end to the era of alleging anything that dials is an ATDS. The argument goes that anything, e.g. an iPhone, my laptop, my oak desk (!), can be modified with enough hardware and software to give it the capacity to dial without human intervention.

Comment: If you are sued pending the Supreme Court decision, you should move to “stay” or delay your case until the Supreme Court rules.

Federal Communications Commission

In the meantime, the FCC is currently considering more than 30 petitions for clarification regarding various aspects of the TCPA and the agency’s regulations. Recently, the National Consumer Law Center requested to reverse the FCC’s order on peer-to-peer texting.

Comment: Do not expect plaintiffs and their counsel to give up these fights easily given the amount of money they have won and can win in the future in these cases.

The FCC has also clarified that the COVID-19 pandemic qualifies as an “emergency” under the TCPA’s emergency purposes exception. Health care providers can communicate with people who have tested positive and do not need prior express consent because of the “emergency purposes” exemption.

Federal Trade Commission

The FTC has announced fees for access to the national do not call Registry will increase effective October 1, 2020, to $66 for yearly access to Registry phone numbers in a single area code, which is an increase of $1 from FY 2020. The maximum charge to any single entity for accessing all area codes nationwide will now be $18,044 (up from $17,765 in FY 2020).

Comment: The fees increase with the Consumer Price Index.

The FTC also announced it mailed $700,000 in refunds to businesses defrauded in a telemarketing scheme involving “google delisting”. Almost 4,500 businesses will receive refunds. See https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2020/08/ftc-sends-refund-checks-totaling-more-700000-small-business.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that a device that dials from a stored list of numbers but cannot randomly or sequentially generate those numbers qualifies as an ATDS.  Allan v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency. This ruling adds to the growing split on the definition of ATDS with circuit courts.

Comment: The Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the definition of ATDS. Facebook, Inc.  v. Duguid.

Illinois

An Illinois court dismissed a plaintiff’s claim that defendant, debt collector General Revenue Corporation, used an ATDS to call her number. Mosley v. Gen. Revenue Corp. It found that plaintiff’s claim that defendant used an ATDS was implausible because “the business of the defendant is such that it would not need a machine with random or sequential number generation capacities.”

Comment: This is an important ruling for debt collectors, as their sole purpose is to contact specific debtors, not to generate random or sequential numbers.

Oregon

An Oregon court found that more than $925 million in damages in a TCPA case is not unconstitutionally excessive.  Wakefield v. ViSalus, Inc.  The court reasoned that due process does not limit the aggregate statutory damages that can be awarded in a TCPA class action.

Uber

Criminal charges have been filed against a former Uber executive alleging he covered up a data breach violating California privacy law. See https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndca/press-release/file/1306781/download.

Comment: At this point, a data breach likely requires a company provide notice to affected consumers in all 50 states. These notifications are fairly commonplace, so covering up a breach seems stupid. In this situation, perhaps criminally stupid. Please contact us if you would like information regarding data breach rules, or state and federal privacy laws.

The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.
 
  Telemarketing Do Not Call Compliance - Avoid large fines by staying compliant.   NDNCR and SDNCR - National Do Not Call Registry and State Do Not Call Registry - Know the difference.
The Do Not Call Compliance Silver Plan offers an Automated federal and state do not call compliance solution. Scrub your list yourself using our automated list scrubbing system.
Telemarketing companies are required to enroll in the Federal Do Not Call Registry.
Do Not Call Compliance.com has the robust software technology and computer power to properly remove (scrub) the Do Not Call numbers from your telemarketing lists.
The National Do Not Call Registry is a list of phone numbers from consumers who have indicated their preference to limit the telemarketing calls they receive.
This Site is designed for use with MSIE 7+,FF 3.5+, Chrome, Opera and other modern browsers.
A Broadband Internet Connection is recommended for uploading and downloading files.


Terms of Use | User Agreement | Privacy and Security Policy

© Copyright 2003-2021 Do Not Call Compliance - Telemarketing Do Not Call List Compliance Service.
All Rights Reserved. Information on this site is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Do Not Call Compliance | | 800-930-7252