The FTC has a telemarketing sales rule which requires do not call telemarketer compliance
The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers not telemarketing companies
National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000,, Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
2022 Newsletters
2021 Newsletters
2020 Newsletters
2019 Newsletters
2018 Newsletters
2017 Newsletters
2016 Newsletters
2015 Newsletters
2014 Newsletters
2013 Newsletters
2012 Newsletters
2011 Newsletters
2010 Newsletters
2009 Newsletters
2008 Newsletters
2007 Newsletters
2006 Newsletters
2005 Newsletters
2004 Newsletters
State Do Not Call

January 2020 - Call Compliance News

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a dialing system must have a random or sequential number generator (used or not used on a given call) to qualify as an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”).  Glasser v. Hilton Grand Vacations Co.

Comment: This sets up a conflict between the circuits as the Ninth Circuit has ruled otherwise.  The Supreme Court is set to hear a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) case in April, and, in our opinion, likely will find the TCPA to be unconstitutional, at least in part.

Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has proposed a fine of almost $13 million against Scott Rhodes alleging he made more than 6,000 illegal robocalls using false caller ID between May and December 2018.  Some calls attempted to influence the 2018 California U.S. Senate primary and include comments about Senator Diane Feinstein’s Jewish heritage.  The FCC alleged Rhodes made other political calls also using spoofed caller ID.

Comment: The fine amounts to more than $2,000 per telephone call.

Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has sent 19 letters to voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) service providers warning them regarding the “accomplice liability” standards in the Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”), i.e. they can be held liable for the actions of their customers if they know, have reason to know, or consciously avoid knowing of those customers’ illegal activities.

In the letters, the FTC claims that “each illegal call is subject to a maximum civil penalty of $43,280.”

Comment: If you receive a checklist or affidavit from your vendors for you to complete regarding compliance with the TSR or other law, this may have been the cause.  You should review your responses with counsel carefully.


A California court has approved a $2.4 million TCPA settlement against HSBC Bank.  Ahmed v. HSBC Bank.  Ahmed alleged he’d been called on his cell phone using an ATDS without prior express consent.

Comment: Class counsel was awarded $600,000 in fees.  The average plaintiff will receive $92.

South Dakota

A bill has been proposed in the South Dakota House (HB 1131) which would add texts to the state no-call statute and require transmission of the telemarketer’s authentic name and telephone number in caller ID.


A court in Texas has issued final approval of a TCPA class action against Sirius XM Radio.  The judge approved legal fees in the amount of $6.4 million.  Buchanan v. Sirius XM Radio.  It involved allegations of the national “do-not-call” list and Sirius’ internal “do-not-call” list. 

Comment: This is a huge settlement for a “do-not-call” class as most “do-not-call” list cases have been defeated because of the safe harbor for calls placed as the result of error if the caller meets certain other requirements.


A bill is being considered by the Utah House (HB 158) which would create affirmative defenses to certain private causes of action for data breach.  Entities which comply with a written cyber security program that is designed to protect the security and confidentiality of personal information and meet other restrictions would have an affirmative defense if their systems are breached.


A bill has been introduced in the Virginia Senate (SB 695) to direct the attorney general to work with a state department of aging to combat financial elder fraud including telemarketing fraud.


The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.
  Telemarketing Do Not Call Compliance - Avoid large fines by staying compliant.   NDNCR and SDNCR - National Do Not Call Registry and State Do Not Call Registry - Know the difference.
The Do Not Call Compliance Silver Plan offers an Automated federal and state do not call compliance solution. Scrub your list yourself using our automated list scrubbing system.
Telemarketing companies are required to enroll in the Federal Do Not Call Registry.
Do Not Call has the robust software technology and computer power to properly remove (scrub) the Do Not Call numbers from your telemarketing lists.
The National Do Not Call Registry is a list of phone numbers from consumers who have indicated their preference to limit the telemarketing calls they receive.
This Site is designed for use with MSIE 7+,FF 3.5+, Chrome, Opera and other modern browsers.
A Broadband Internet Connection is recommended for uploading and downloading files.

Terms of Use | User Agreement | Privacy and Security Policy

© Copyright 2003-2022 Do Not Call Compliance - Telemarketing Do Not Call List Compliance Service.
All Rights Reserved. Information on this site is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Do Not Call Compliance | | 800-930-7252