The FTC has a telemarketing sales rule which requires do not call telemarketer compliance
The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers not telemarketing companies
National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000,, Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
2022 Newsletters
2021 Newsletters
2020 Newsletters
2019 Newsletters
2018 Newsletters
2017 Newsletters
2016 Newsletters
2015 Newsletters
2014 Newsletters
2013 Newsletters
2012 Newsletters
2011 Newsletters
2010 Newsletters
2009 Newsletters
2008 Newsletters
2007 Newsletters
2006 Newsletters
2005 Newsletters
2004 Newsletters
State Do Not Call

November 2004 - Call Compliance News

The FTC has established a fifteen day safe harbor for calls to numbers recently “ported” from wire line to wireless numbers. This fifteen day safe harbor means that you will be required to scrub against a ported number database at least every fifteen days. Neustar is the company designated by the FCC to administer this list and is available at

The FCC has delayed implementation of the new rules requiring a signed written document to send a facsimile for six months through June 30, 2005. In the Order, released on October 1, 2004, the FCC acknowledged that the TCPA likely will be amended to allow faxes to be sent to businesses or other recipients with whom the sender has an established business relationship.

The FCC has requested comments regarding whether it should preempt state “do-not-call” lists with regard to application of interstate calls. Now is the time to prepare your comments to the FCC showing that a national system best protects consumer rights and allows businesses easy compliance. State attorneys general can enforce the federal laws so there is no reason why the FCC should not make this decision. Please contact me if you would like assistance in drafting appropriate comments.

The FCC announcement that the new rules regarding unsolicited faxes will be delayed until June 30, 2005, was published in the Federal Register this month.

Effective October 18, 2004, the FCC implemented regulations applicable to commercial text messages generally prohibiting unsolicited commercial messages or implying other restrictions to their use. Our firm has prepared a Memorandum on this topic which I can provide you upon request.

NAAG has published a summary of state attorney general telemarketing actions to date in September 30, 2004. The chart is available at:, and includes the name of the defendants, the action taken (e.g. settlement, suit filed, etc.) and a one-word reason for the suit (e.g. deceptive trade practices, etc.).

The United States Postal Service has announced a major initiative against telemarketing fraud. The Postal Service is one of at least three federal agencies with consumer protection jurisdiction in this area.

The United States Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from the Tenth Circuit decision upholding the national “do-not-call” list.

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has vetoed a bill which would require a disclosure of location of telemarketer upon demand for inbound or outbound calls. This bill is one of several anti off-shore laws being considered in various states.

Governor Schwarzenegger has signed a law which prohibits cellular telephone providers from including subscriber telephone numbers in telephone directories without first obtaining consent from the consumers.

Illinois has filed suit against two Canadian telemarketing companies alleging unauthorized transfers from consumers’ accounts under the guise of sales of the new Medicare discount prescription drug card program.

Iowa has filed suit against a Delaware telemarketer based in Arizona alleging improper withdrawals from consumers’ bank accounts. The Telemarketing Sales Rule requires specific disclosures with regard to draft payments from consumers’ accounts.

The Federal Court in Louisiana has ruled that class-action was proper under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and that the suit was properly brought in federal court.

Minnesota has filed suite against a telecommunications company alleging that its telemarketers transferred persons’ long distance provider without consent.

The Minnesota Attorney General's Office has issued a Memorandum to all political candidates announcing its intention to enforce its state law regarding delivery of recordings which does not allow political messages. As you know, the federal law allows political messages, and almost every state telemarketing statutes contains a similar exemption. Recently the FCC has asked whether it should preempt a similar state law in North Dakota. The Attorney General has announced if it receives three or more verified substantiated complaints about a given candidate, it will file a lawsuit and seek a TRO to enjoin further violations of the law.

New Jersey's Division of Consumer Affairs has been directed by the legislature to establish a credit card “do-not-solicit” list containing the names of mentally ill individuals and senior citizens who are not to be solicited for credit cards upon notification by a family member or an agent of that person. The list does incorporate a safe harbor provision similar to that found in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

North Carolina has obtained a temporary restraining order against a company which placed telemarketing calls to a hospital switchboard. The calls were prerecorded advertisements for satellite television which are illegal under state and federal law.

Texas as settled claims against three telemarketers regarding allegations of violation of Texas “do-not-call” list law.


The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.
  Telemarketing Do Not Call Compliance - Avoid large fines by staying compliant.   NDNCR and SDNCR - National Do Not Call Registry and State Do Not Call Registry - Know the difference.
The Do Not Call Compliance Silver Plan offers an Automated federal and state do not call compliance solution. Scrub your list yourself using our automated list scrubbing system.
Telemarketing companies are required to enroll in the Federal Do Not Call Registry.
Do Not Call has the robust software technology and computer power to properly remove (scrub) the Do Not Call numbers from your telemarketing lists.
The National Do Not Call Registry is a list of phone numbers from consumers who have indicated their preference to limit the telemarketing calls they receive.
This Site is designed for use with MSIE 7+,FF 3.5+, Chrome, Opera and other modern browsers.
A Broadband Internet Connection is recommended for uploading and downloading files.

Terms of Use | User Agreement | Privacy and Security Policy

© Copyright 2003-2023 Do Not Call Compliance - Telemarketing Do Not Call List Compliance Service.
All Rights Reserved. Information on this site is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Do Not Call Compliance | | 800-930-7252