The FTC has a telemarketing sales rule which requires do not call telemarketer compliance
The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers not telemarketing companies
National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000,, Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
2022 Newsletters
2021 Newsletters
2020 Newsletters
2019 Newsletters
2018 Newsletters
2017 Newsletters
2016 Newsletters
2015 Newsletters
2014 Newsletters
2013 Newsletters
2012 Newsletters
2011 Newsletters
2010 Newsletters
2009 Newsletters
2008 Newsletters
2007 Newsletters
2006 Newsletters
2005 Newsletters
2004 Newsletters
State Do Not Call

April 2005 - Call Compliance News

President Bush has appointed Kevin J. Martin, a current Commissioner of the FCC, as the head of the FCC. The appointment does not require Senate confirmation because he is already a Commissioner.

A new waive of legislation in states allows consumers to put a “security freeze” on a credit history. Merchants are unavailable to review consumers’ credit history which are “frozen.” The effect of these laws on teleservices industry remains to be seen.

A bill has been proposed in Indiana which would prohibit state contracts with businesses which do not comply with Indiana’s “no-call” list, even if the law is preempted by the FCC. The law’s response to the Consumer Bankers Association’s Petition to the FCC to preempt “no-call” laws in Indiana and other states.

A bill has been proposed in Iowa which would require certain disclosures for political telephone calls. Calls including “push polls” would be required to disclose the identity of the individual who is calling and the entity with which the individual is affiliated, as well as the individual that paid for the telephone communication. The law would also require disclosure of the name, telephone number and address of an individual who the call recipient can contact for further information.

The Kentucky House has passed a resolution urging the Federal Communications Commission to not preempt state “do-not-call” laws.

A cellular telephone distributor is not liable under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act where the distributor salesman acted outside the scope of his employment when sending unsolicited fax advertisements

A bill has been proposed in the Minnesota Senate which would require that inbound and outbound call centers provide, upon request, the location of the call center, as well as the name of the individual and company and how the consumer can speak to an employee of the company hiring the telemarketing firm.

A bill has been proposed in New York which would limit the state’s established business relationship exemption from its “do-not-call” list to calls to current customers.A bill in New York has been proposed which would create an 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM curfew for telephone solicitation calls. The current federal curfew is 8:00 AM to 9:00 PM.

A company has settled charges by the State of North Dakota that it violated the state’s prerecorded message statute. As you may know, some state laws regarding prerecorded messages vary from the standard set forth in the TCPA.

An Ohio court has ruled that the sender of a prerecorded message did send an unsolicited advertisement and was liable for damages to the recipient. The sender of the fax did not have a “do-not-call” policy at the time it made the call and was not a nonprofit organization.

A bill has been proposed in Pennsylvania which would bar wireless telephone companies from providing an personal consumer data to any third-party without written consent.AT&T has settled a Pennsylvania “do-not-call” complaint for $34,500 in fines and investigative costs. The plaintiff alleged 60 illegal calls to persons on the national “do-not-call” list.A bill has been proposed in Pennsylvania which would regulate "push-polls" on behalf of a particular political candidate or issue. Telemarketers would be required to disclose the purpose of the call, the name of the telemarketing business, and what issue the telemarketer is advocating.A bill has been proposed in Pennsylvania which would amend the definition of “telephone solicitation call” to remove the current exemption for calls on behalf of a tax exempt organization. Telemarketers placing calls in this category would now be subject to the law including its registration requirement. The registration requirement, however, does have numerous exemptions.

A bill has been proposed in Texas which would require that inbound and outbound call centers disclose the city, state and country where the representative is located plus the name of the employee and the call center. Call centers outside the United States would be required to transfer the call to a person in the United States upon request.The Texas House is considering a bill which would allow the state “do-not-call” list to combine its telephone numbers with those Texas numbers on the national “do-not-call” list.

Utah has passed a law which requires telephone solicitors to honor company-specific “do-not-call” requests. As you may know, the federal TCPA already contains this provision as does the Telemarketing Sales Rule.Utah has passed a law which amends the sales-consumer protection law to ban the use of unsolicited checks or negotiable instruments which obligate the consumer to purchase a product or service if cashed. The law exempts depository institutions and affiliates of financial institutions.

A bill has been proposed in West Virginia which would require the state to contract only with telemarketing call centers located in the United States.

A bill has been proposed in West Virginia which would create a state "do-not-call" list. The Public Services Commission is authorized to charge consumers a fee to add their name to the list.

The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.
  Telemarketing Do Not Call Compliance - Avoid large fines by staying compliant.   NDNCR and SDNCR - National Do Not Call Registry and State Do Not Call Registry - Know the difference.
The Do Not Call Compliance Silver Plan offers an Automated federal and state do not call compliance solution. Scrub your list yourself using our automated list scrubbing system.
Telemarketing companies are required to enroll in the Federal Do Not Call Registry.
Do Not Call has the robust software technology and computer power to properly remove (scrub) the Do Not Call numbers from your telemarketing lists.
The National Do Not Call Registry is a list of phone numbers from consumers who have indicated their preference to limit the telemarketing calls they receive.
This Site is designed for use with MSIE 7+,FF 3.5+, Chrome, Opera and other modern browsers.
A Broadband Internet Connection is recommended for uploading and downloading files.

Terms of Use | User Agreement | Privacy and Security Policy

© Copyright 2003-2024 Do Not Call Compliance - Telemarketing Do Not Call List Compliance Service.
All Rights Reserved. Information on this site is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Do Not Call Compliance | | 800-930-7252