The FTC has a telemarketing sales rule which requires do not call telemarketer compliance
The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers not telemarketing companies
National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News
DO NOT CALL STATE & FEDERAL REGULATORY NEWS

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000, http://copilevitz-canter.com/, braney@cckc-law.com. Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or donotcallcompliance.com and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
 
2021 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
2020 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2019 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2016 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2013 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2011 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2010 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2009 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
2008 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2007 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2006 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2005 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2004 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State Do Not Call
 

May, 2014 - Call Compliance News

In this issue:
•The FCC is considering a petition regarding what liability would result when a number, previously provided to the caller, is reassigned to a new consumer. United Health Care Services, Inc. Petition for Expedited Declaratory Ruling.
•A judge in Hawaii has dismissed a TCPA case brought by an individual who provided her cell phone number to an airline then later received a text asking if she wished to receive flight information on the cell phone.
•The state of Wisconsin has repealed its “do-not-call” list law (2013 Senate Bill 155) and, after August 1, 2014, will no longer require purchase of its state “do-not-call” list, which had cost up to $20,000 per year, depending on the number of lines used. After that date, Wisconsin will enforce the federal “do-not-call” list and allow the state’s Department of Agriculture and Trade to share Wisconsin numbers with the FTC if they are not already on the national “do-not-call” registry.

Federal Communications Commission
FCC Commissioner Michael O’Reilly has written a blog post urging the FCC to review petitions for clarity regarding interpretations of the TCPA in the current class action environment.


Comment: I personally have a preemption petition that the FCC has failed to address in more than a decade.

The FCC has issued a citation with a $640,000 forfeiture order against Presidential Who’s Who for allegedly faxing more than 100 illegal advertisements to consumers. The entity had previously received a formal citation from the Commission.


Comment: The FCC cannot fine telephone companies without first issuing a citation. If you receive a citation, you should review and respond. The FCC will rescind a citation if the entity proves it did not violate the law.

The FCC is considering a petition regarding what liability would result when a number, previously provided to the caller, is reassigned to a new consumer. United Health Care Services, Inc. Petition for Expedited Declaratory Ruling.


Comment: Many TCPA actions have been brought by persons who will be assigned a number from an earlier consumer who gave express consent. This petition could protect businesses, which knowingly call those new consumers, from potential massive liability.

Federal Trade Commission
Two companies have settled charges that they misrepresented the security of their mobile apps with regard to sensitive consumer personal information. FTC v. Fandango, et al.


Comment: The FTC generally uses its power to prevent general “unfair trade practices” to force restrictions regarding consumer privacy.

California
A California court has denied certification of a TCPA class because the plaintiff provided his telephone number to the business and thus is not a representative of the class. Ryan v. Jersey Mike’s Franchise.

Connecticut
The Connecticut Senate has passed a bill (SB 209) which adds text messages into the definition of “telephonic sales call” subject to the State’s curfew and “do-not-call” list restrictions. The bill would also prohibit prerecorded telephonic sales calls without prior express written consent.


Comment: These restrictions duplicate federal law already in place.

Florida
A Florida court has refused to dismiss a case brought against Obama for America by an individual (representing a class) who received calls on her cell phone in the last election. Shamblin v. Obama for America. The court considered, but did not rule on, the First Amendment “chilling” caused by the huge amount of damages potentially available under the TCPA.


Comment: More entities are considering challenging the TCPA on First Amendment grounds. This case may be first to specifically rule on the issue.

Hawaii
A judge has dismissed a TCPA case brought by an individual who provided her cell phone number to an airline then later received a text asking if she wished to receive flight information on the cell phone.


Comment: This case upholds the FCC’s ruling that providing a telephone number is “prior express consent” for non-marketing messages. Baird v. Sabre, Inc.

Missouri
A Missouri court has refused to dismiss a TCPA action brought against a producer of a film after the film hired an advertiser to place prerecorded calls encouraging attendance at theaters. Golan v. Veritas Entertainment, et al. The call purported to be a survey of Governor Mike Huckabee but clearly encouraged attendance at the film.


Comment: The judge indicated that the plaintiffs, who did not actually receive the prerecorded portion of the call, might not have standing to bring a challenge.

Texas
A Texas court has ruled that a plaintiff did not have a private cause of action to sue for improper transmission of caller identification information. Clark v. Avatar Techs, et al.


Comment: Once more, courts have ruled that the TCPA provides for a cause of action for the call, itself, not any other alleged violations within or associated with the call.

Wisconsin
The state of Wisconsin has repealed its “do-not-call” list law (2013 Senate Bill 155) and, after August 1, 2014, will no longer require purchase of its state “do-not-call” list, which had cost up to $20,000 per year, depending on the number of lines used. After that date, Wisconsin will enforce the federal “do-not-call” list and allow the state’s Department of Agriculture and Trade to share Wisconsin numbers with the FTC if they are not already on the national “do-not-call” registry. The state will create a “registration,” details of which will be set by the agency through the rule-making process.

The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.
 
  Telemarketing Do Not Call Compliance - Avoid large fines by staying compliant.   NDNCR and SDNCR - National Do Not Call Registry and State Do Not Call Registry - Know the difference.
The Do Not Call Compliance Silver Plan offers an Automated federal and state do not call compliance solution. Scrub your list yourself using our automated list scrubbing system.
Telemarketing companies are required to enroll in the Federal Do Not Call Registry.
Do Not Call Compliance.com has the robust software technology and computer power to properly remove (scrub) the Do Not Call numbers from your telemarketing lists.
The National Do Not Call Registry is a list of phone numbers from consumers who have indicated their preference to limit the telemarketing calls they receive.
This Site is designed for use with MSIE 7+,FF 3.5+, Chrome, Opera and other modern browsers.
A Broadband Internet Connection is recommended for uploading and downloading files.


Terms of Use | User Agreement | Privacy and Security Policy

© Copyright 2003-2021 Do Not Call Compliance - Telemarketing Do Not Call List Compliance Service.
All Rights Reserved. Information on this site is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Do Not Call Compliance | | 800-930-7252