The FTC has a telemarketing sales rule which requires do not call telemarketer compliance
The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers not telemarketing companies
National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000,, Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
2022 Newsletters
2021 Newsletters
2020 Newsletters
2019 Newsletters
2018 Newsletters
2017 Newsletters
2016 Newsletters
2015 Newsletters
2014 Newsletters
2013 Newsletters
2012 Newsletters
2011 Newsletters
2010 Newsletters
2009 Newsletters
2008 Newsletters
2007 Newsletters
2006 Newsletters
2005 Newsletters
2004 Newsletters
State Do Not Call

October 2020 - Call Compliance News

Supreme Court of the United States

Numerous entities have filed amicus, i.e. “friend of the court” briefs with the Supreme Court in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) case to be argued this winter. Facebook v. Duguid. State attorneys general claimed in their amicus brief that the TCPA was necessary due to “practical difficulties with interstate enforcement of state law.”

With the appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, many TCPA commentators are noticing that she wrote an opinion in Gadelhak v. AT&T Services while she was a Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals judge, taking a narrow view of the definition of an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”).

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that “incentive” awards to lead plaintiffs in class action suits are unlawful. Johnson v. NPAS Solutions, LLC. The Court vacated the lower court’s approval of a $1.432 million settlement which would pay the lead plaintiff $6,000 and other class members $7.97 each.

Federal Communications Commission

On October 1, 2020, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking proposing exemptions to the TCPA’s ban on certain prerecorded calls to residential lines, as well as what changes need to be made to existing exemptions based on the TRACED Act. See /attachments/FCC-20-140A1.pdf.  The TRACED Act is designed to prohibit abusive robocalls.

The FCC has issued a guide entitled “Stop Unwanted Robocalls and Text Messages”. See It advises consumers “don’t answer calls from unknown numbers …” among other things.

Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has issued its national “do-not-call” registry data book for 2020. See The list includes more than 241 million telephone numbers and generated more than three million complaints this year.

The FTC has issued a temporary restraining order halting the business of an Atlanta-based debt collector, Critical Resolution Mediation, LLC, alleging violations of the Firm Transmission Capacity Purchase Agreement (“FTCPA”).


A Florida television station is reporting that Republicans are sending more prerecorded calls than Democrats because their base is older and uses landlines. Younger generations are more likely to receive text messages.


A Louisiana court ruled that the TCPA’s cell phone call ban is unenforceable prior to July 6, 2020. Creasy v. Charter Communications. The court based this decision on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in AAPC v. Barr, in which the Supreme Court severed the debt collection exemption from the TCPA’s cell phone call ban. It opined that if the cell phone call ban was unconstitutional prior to severing the exemption, it should not be enforceable at all.

Comment: If you are currently a defendant in a TCPA case involving calls or texts prior to July 6, 2020, you should bring this argument to your court immediately.


Arrest warrants were issued for two individuals charged with sending thousands of prerecorded calls that falsely warned people that information obtained from their mail-in ballots could lead to their arrest or forced vaccinations. Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman were charged with bribery and voter intimidation after being indicted by a grand jury in Cuyahoga County.

The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.
  Telemarketing Do Not Call Compliance - Avoid large fines by staying compliant.   NDNCR and SDNCR - National Do Not Call Registry and State Do Not Call Registry - Know the difference.
The Do Not Call Compliance Silver Plan offers an Automated federal and state do not call compliance solution. Scrub your list yourself using our automated list scrubbing system.
Telemarketing companies are required to enroll in the Federal Do Not Call Registry.
Do Not Call has the robust software technology and computer power to properly remove (scrub) the Do Not Call numbers from your telemarketing lists.
The National Do Not Call Registry is a list of phone numbers from consumers who have indicated their preference to limit the telemarketing calls they receive.
This Site is designed for use with MSIE 7+,FF 3.5+, Chrome, Opera and other modern browsers.
A Broadband Internet Connection is recommended for uploading and downloading files.

Terms of Use | User Agreement | Privacy and Security Policy

© Copyright 2003-2023 Do Not Call Compliance - Telemarketing Do Not Call List Compliance Service.
All Rights Reserved. Information on this site is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Do Not Call Compliance | | 800-930-7252