The FTC has a telemarketing sales rule which requires do not call telemarketer compliance
The Federal Trade Commission protects consumers not telemarketing companies
National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000,, Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
2022 Newsletters
2021 Newsletters
2020 Newsletters
2019 Newsletters
2018 Newsletters
2017 Newsletters
2016 Newsletters
2015 Newsletters
2014 Newsletters
2013 Newsletters
2012 Newsletters
2011 Newsletters
2010 Newsletters
2009 Newsletters
2008 Newsletters
2007 Newsletters
2006 Newsletters
2005 Newsletters
2004 Newsletters
State Do Not Call

February 2005 - Call Compliance News

FCC Chairman Powell has resigned from his chairmanship of the Federal Communications Commission. This likely with have little effect on FCC enforcement or interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Canadian health officials are drafting a proposal to prevent internet pharmacies from selling mail order prescription drugs to United States customers. As of now, I would advise against any telemarketing campaign on behalf of Canadian drug providers as the FDA’s opinion is these sales are illegal, and you could be held liable under the accomplice liability standard for illegal sales.

Alaska is considering a bill which would modify the state’s telemarketing law to ban recorded telephone calls for political purposes to Alaska consumers whose names are on the state or federal “do-not-call” lists. It is highly doubtful, given the subject matter of the banned calls, that this will pass the legislature. It is even more doubtful that the law would be constitutional if passed. The bill has been sent to a House Committee.

The State of Arizona has settled with a leasing company with regard to telecommunications fraud involving NorVergence, Inc.

A bill has been proposed in Connecticut which will require telemarketers to disclose, upon request, the name of the person on whose behalf the call is being made and the name, business address and telephone number of the supervisor in charge of such paid caller.

Another bill has been proposed in Connecticut which would extend the “do-not-call” list to political phone calls.

A bill has been proposed in Georgia which would create a felony for persons who send more that 10,000 false or misleading messages in one day via email. The bill also outlines the misdemeanor charges for lesser violations.

A bill has been proposed in the Indiana House which would prohibit political calls to persons on the Indiana “do-not-call” list.

An Indiana bill has been proposed which would allow the inclusion of mobile telephone numbers on the state “do-not-call” list.

A bill has been proposed in the Iowa Senate which would create a state “do-not-call” list. The list would exempt calls to consumers with whom the caller has an established business relationship and calls by or on behalf of a tax exempt organization if a bonafide member of the organization makes the call.

A bill has been proposed in the Mississippi House which would add facsimile numbers to the Mississippi “do-not-call” list. Unsolicited facsimiles are already illegal under the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act and sending them can subject any business to potentially huge liability under federal law.

The Mississippi House is considering a bill which would require prompt disclosure of the geographical location from which the call is placed for all telemarketing calls.

Missouri’s Attorney General has issued a Top 10 list for consumer complaints. Cramming and slamming top the list of consumer complaints followed by home repair, travel and timeshare complaints, and unsolicited faxes.

Missouri is considering a bill which would amend its definition of “telephone solicitation” to include facsimiles and text messaging within its restrictions thus applying the state “do-not-call” list to those types of calls.

I spoke with a member of the Missouri House of Representatives who told me that the bill proposed by Missouri’s Attorney General to eliminate exemptions of state “do-not-call” lists has little chance of passing.

New York’s Attorney General has settled with a group of five leasing companies with regard to telecommunications fraud and the telephone equipment originally sold by NorVergence, Inc.

A regulation has been proposed in New York which would raise the penalty amount on the “do-not-call” list to $11,000 per violation from $5,000 per violation.

North Dakota is considering a bill which would require oral disclosures for any business telemarketing discount medical plans. The disclosure include that the plan is not an insurance policy, that the plan includes discounts for medical services, name, address and telephone number of the organization, and the cancellation and refund rights provided by state law.

Pennsylvania’s Attorney General has filed suit against a home security company for allegedly violating state “do-not-call” list laws and the state’s telemarketer registration law. The latter charge likely will not proceed as Pennsylvania’s telemarketing registration law exempts persons who do not complete a sale until a later face-to-face meeting (e.g. installation of home security systems).

Rhode Island is considering a bill which would create a state “do-not-call” list effective January 1, 2006.

Texas is considering a bill which would add Texas telephone numbers included on the national “do-not-call” list to its state “do-not-call” list.

The Utah House is considering a bill which would limit application of the state’s “do-not-call” list to intrastate telemarketing calls. The FCC may soon take the same action.

The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.
  Telemarketing Do Not Call Compliance - Avoid large fines by staying compliant.   NDNCR and SDNCR - National Do Not Call Registry and State Do Not Call Registry - Know the difference.
The Do Not Call Compliance Silver Plan offers an Automated federal and state do not call compliance solution. Scrub your list yourself using our automated list scrubbing system.
Telemarketing companies are required to enroll in the Federal Do Not Call Registry.
Do Not Call has the robust software technology and computer power to properly remove (scrub) the Do Not Call numbers from your telemarketing lists.
The National Do Not Call Registry is a list of phone numbers from consumers who have indicated their preference to limit the telemarketing calls they receive.
This Site is designed for use with MSIE 7+,FF 3.5+, Chrome, Opera and other modern browsers.
A Broadband Internet Connection is recommended for uploading and downloading files.

Terms of Use | User Agreement | Privacy and Security Policy

© Copyright 2003-2023 Do Not Call Compliance - Telemarketing Do Not Call List Compliance Service.
All Rights Reserved. Information on this site is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.

Do Not Call Compliance | | 800-930-7252